Course record BMED
BMED 2210
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
95 sections12 professors
Grades: 2010–2020Evaluations: 2012–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score3/100
Needs work
Johannes Leisen 5 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2020 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2020
Compare with the course
Leisen vs. the course average
A
+6.6
B
+3.2
C
−3.9
D
−3.2
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2020
Overall4.00 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.57
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication3.77
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.52
Maysam Nezafati 11 sections · 10 terms · 2016–2020 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2016–2020
Compare with the course
Nezafati vs. the course average
A
+14.8
B
−8.4
C
−7.5
D
+0.5
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2016Spring 2020
Overall4.59 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.51
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.31
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.12
Instructor stimulates interest4.36
Paul Benkeser 8 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2013 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Benkeser vs. the course average
A
−7.4
B
+21.0
C
−7.4
D
−3.2
F
−3.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.33 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest3.35
Edward Botchwey 21 sections · 12 terms · 2013–2019 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 21 sections · 2013–2019
Compare with the course
Botchwey vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
+2.4
C
−4.4
D
same
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Fall 2019
Overall2.95 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.44
Instructor clarity2.60
Course effectiveness3.15
Instructor enthusiasm3.48
Instructor helpfulness2.38
Instructor availability2.92
Instructor communication2.81
Instructor effectiveness2.73
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.18
Instructor stimulates interest2.73
Todd Mcdevitt 2 sections · 1 term · 2010 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010
Compare with the course
Mcdevitt vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−8.4
C
−0.2
D
+1.2
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Joseph Ledoux 18 sections · 16 terms · 2011–2020 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2011–2020
Compare with the course
Ledoux vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
−3.7
C
+3.5
D
−0.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2020
Overall4.42 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness3.96
Instructor availability4.49
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.06
Instructor stimulates interest4.14
Gabriel Kwong 5 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2018 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2015–2018
Compare with the course
Kwong vs. the course average
A
−9.6
B
+8.1
C
+3.7
D
−1.8
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.50 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.24
Instructor clarity4.74
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.32
Instructor communication4.46
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Robert Lee 14 sections · 7 terms · 2010–2015 2.51GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−17.4
B
−6.8
C
+17.8
D
+3.8
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2015
Overall3.59 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity3.38
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness2.63
Instructor availability3.82
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness3.32
Instructor respectfulness3.58
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Michael Filler 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 2.48GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Filler vs. the course average
A
−5.6
B
−16.0
C
+0.3
D
+16.5
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness3.75
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Athanasios Mantalaris 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Gilda Barabino 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Rodney Averett 11 reported responses 2.75Eval / 5
Overall2.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.55
Instructor clarity2.80
Course effectiveness2.30
Instructor enthusiasm3.25
Instructor helpfulness2.40
Instructor availability2.60
Instructor communication2.60
Instructor effectiveness2.40
Instructor respectfulness3.55
Assignment measured knowledge2.70
Instructor stimulates interest2.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.