Course record BIOL
BIOL 4590
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
47 sections22 professors
Grades: 2010–2019Evaluations: 2012–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record
Patrick Mcgrath 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2016 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Mcgrath vs. the course average
A
+16.6
B
−13.7
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Kirill Lobachev 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2019 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2019
Compare with the course
Lobachev vs. the course average
A
+14.8
B
−11.9
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2019
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Jeffrey Skolnick 5 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2019 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2013–2019
Compare with the course
Skolnick vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−11.2
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2019
Overall4.88 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.96
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.92
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.94
Instructor respectfulness4.96
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
David Hu 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2018 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2018
Compare with the course
Hu vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−6.2
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Spring 2018
Overall3.64 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity3.35
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.52
Instructor availability3.95
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest3.58
Francesca Storici 5 sections · 5 terms · 2012–2019 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2012–2019
Compare with the course
Storici vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−3.1
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Spring 2019
Overall4.32 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.42
Instructor clarity3.45
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.15
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Gerald Pullman 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Pullman vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
−1.7
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Ingeborg Schmidt-Krey 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2017 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2017
Compare with the course
Schmidt-Krey vs. the course average
A
−8.1
B
+5.1
C
+3.9
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Fall 2017
Overall4.79 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.67
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Linda Green 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2014 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+5.8
C
+4.4
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Lin Jiang 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2018 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2018
Compare with the course
Jiang vs. the course average
A
−12.9
B
+10.3
C
+3.4
D
−0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2018
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.27
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
David Garton 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Garton vs. the course average
A
−15.7
B
+11.4
C
+0.3
D
−0.2
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2011Summer 2014
Overall4.47 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Eric Gaucher 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
John Bardill 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.66 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Joseph Mendelson 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.91 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.93
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Yuhong Fan 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Shana Kerr 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.75 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Jennifer Leavey 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Thomas Dichristina 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.30 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Julia Kubanek 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Roger Wartell 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Vinayak Agarwal 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Simon Sponberg 7 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Emily Weigel 10 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.