Course record BIOL
BIOL 4450
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
37 sections18 professors
Grades: 2010–2015Evaluations: 2012–2015
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score65/100
Strong
Eric Gaucher 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2014 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Gaucher vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−12.8
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Chong Shin 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Shin vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−12.8
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.40
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Ingeborg Schmidt-Krey 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2015 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2015
Compare with the course
Schmidt-Krey vs. the course average
A
+10.7
B
−9.3
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Jeffrey Skolnick 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2013 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Skolnick vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−6.8
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Yuhong Fan 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2015 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
Fan vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−7.8
C
+1.6
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.23 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.35
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.15
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Christine Spencer 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2014 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Spencer vs. the course average
A
+11.2
B
−12.8
C
−0.7
D
same
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.55 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Lin Jiang 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2014 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Jiang vs. the course average
A
+11.2
B
−12.8
C
−0.7
D
same
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Jeanette Yen 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2013 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Yen vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
−4.4
C
−0.7
D
same
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.92 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability3.40
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Gerald Pullman 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2013 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Pullman vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
+5.2
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.71 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Julia Kubanek 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Kubanek vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+3.8
C
+1.1
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2014
Overall4.78 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Roger Wartell 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2013 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Wartell vs. the course average
A
−16.8
B
+16.2
C
+1.3
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
David Garton 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Garton vs. the course average
A
−38.0
B
+39.4
C
−0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Fredrik Vannberg 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.61 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Jennifer Leavey 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.38 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Stephen Harvey 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Meghan Duffy 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.35 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Shana Kerr 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.51 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Terry Snell 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.